North Korean Troops to Ukraine: Outsourcing the Axis
By: Capt. Grant T.
Willis & Capt. Brendan H.J. Donnelly, USAF | Dec 7th, 2024
The DPRK Enters the Fray
On February 24th 2022 the
world was stunned with the Russian invasion of Ukraine, being the largest
invasion in Europe in almost 80 years. Since then, we have witnessed continuous
combat between the two nations to include ground combat operations, naval
combat and aerial engagements using missiles, aircraft and unmanned aerial
vehicles (UAV). As reported by the United States Department of Defense (DoD),
Russia has lost 350,000 soldiers over 31 months of conflict with Ukraine.[1]
This drastic loss of life has forced Russia to look towards its allies such as
Iran, Peoples Republic of China (PRC), and the Democratic People’s Republic of
Korea (DPRK) for support with military supplies and now as reported military
forces. Although disputed by Russia and China, multiple intelligence agencies
and reports from numerous countries have identified that in October, the DPRK
sent 1,500 special operations forces to assist the Russian military fighting
against Ukraine.[2]
Since October,
several sources have now identified the first deployment of 1,500 has grown to
a total of 10-12,000 DPRK soldiers.[3]
These additional soldiers “considered to be the best” from the DPRK 11th
Corps, were deployed to the Kursk region within Russia to mass with other
Russian military forces, making up a total of 50,000 troops ready to combat the
Ukrainian advances in Kursk.[4]
According to Newsweek there have been mixed reports on if DPRK soldiers
have been casualties already or have been kept of the front lines to train in
artillery and infantry basics.[5]
Many sources speculate as to why the DPRK deployed soldiers to support Russia,
yet the most likely reason has to do with the Treaty on Comprehensive Strategic
Partnership that was signed by Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong-Un. The treaty
stated “in case any one of the two sides [Russia or DPRK] is put in a state of
war by an armed invasion from an individual state or several states, the other side
shall provide military and other assistance with all means in its possession
without delay”.[6]
Within the last two years of fighting between Russia and Ukraine, the DPRK had
already been sending missiles, munitions and supplies to Russia. Although, with
the Ukrainians mounting operations in Kursk, the treaty was enacted and is
likely a driving reason for why the DPRK has sent military support. It also
must be mentioned that even though the Russian’s have not openly identified or
promised any support for the DPRK, it is likely that there has been some
agreement between President Putin and Kim Jong-Un for Russian assistance in
either missile technology, nuclear technology or the DPRK space program.
This situation now
has the attention of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and nations
providing support to Ukraine, as the deployment is a serious move from Russia
and the DPRK. Although, in history, the DPRK has acted in very similar ways in
relation to North Vietnam and Egypt. Further, these historic examples will
illuminate similar deployments of troops and could identify potential next
steps from the DPRK in the Russian scenario.
Historic DPRK
Deployments: North Vietnam and Egypt
A little more than
a decade after the end of the Korean War between the DPRK and the Republic of
Korea (ROK), the DPRK had pledged support to North Vietnam in 1965. The
original agreement between Kim Il-Sung and Ho Chi Minh was “The Korean people
will provide any kind of support, including weapons, to the Vietnamese comrades
and upon request will send volunteer forces”.[7]
This support was two pronged. First, for the DPRK it was about supporting
socialist nations and their struggle. Second, to combat the support that the
United States was providing to South Vietnam. Thusly, the DPRK pushed
propaganda within their media to rise a volunteer force willing to deploy to
North Vietnam, to protect from a future invasion of North Korea from the United
States.
The forces sent by
the DPRK included 500 workers and experts to assist the North Vietnamese in
building their tunnel system.[8]
One year later, in 1966, the DPRK then sent an Air Force regiment to North
Vietnam. Reports disagree on the total number of personnel sent, but the number
was roughly 87-100 pilots.[9]
These pilots would fly Soviet equipment on behalf of the North Vietnamese, and were directed to be disguised as North
Vietnamese airplanes as well. The DPRK pilots primarily operated in and around
Hanoi protecting the North Vietnamese capital and fighting off U.S. aircraft in
North Vietnamese airspace.
The next conflict
that the DPRK supported was in 1973, the Yom Kippur War. Leading up to this
conflict Egypt had claimed that their military strength was insufficient to
take on the Israeli military, backed by the United States. Therefore, Egypt had
looked to the Soviet Union to support them with advanced military equipment and
training to prepare the Egyptian military and specifically their Air Force for
combat later in 1973. Yet, at the time in 1972, the Soviet Union was reluctant
to provide Egypt with advanced weaponry and training, which resulted in Egypt
expelling most of the Soviet advisers from their country.[10]
Egypt then turned to China and their militant
approach to dealing with the Middle East. Additionally, Egypt sought support
from the DPRK as they had recent combat experience in North Vietnam, and their
pilots were experienced with Soviet equipment.[11]
In early 1973, Egypt requested from the DPRK a regiment of Air Force personnel
to train the Egyptian Air Force prior to the Yom Kippur War later that year. By
the end of the conflict the DPRK had sent Egypt 1,500 advisors and 39 Air Force
personnel.[12]
During this time DPRK pilots flying their MiG-21s engaged Israeli Air Force
(IAF) F-4 Phantoms in dogfighting. Although, both the deployment of forces to
North Vietnam and Egypt included pilots there are still some similarities that
can be drawn between them and the deployment to Ukraine.
Havana Syndrome
Another, indirect,
Cold War connection to the deployment of a DPRK expeditionary force to fight on
behalf of Russia can be drawn from a series of interventions by the communists
in Africa by Fidel Castro’s Cuba.
Heavily involved in the ideological mission of fighting wars of national
liberation, Fidel found a way to not only exercise his internationalist fever,
but to gain prestige amongst the East by deploying troops and air forces to
fight directly where the Soviets would not.
In 1975, the Portuguese had been driven out of their former colony
Angola by several insurgent factions, jockeying for power. The MPLA (People’s Movement for the
Liberation of Angola) was Marxist and battled western backed factions attempting
to take control of the West African nation’s capital, Luanda. Although the CIA and American military, after
the withdrawal from Southeast Asia, would not be allowed to intervene against
the establishment of a communist government after the Portuguese route and the
Soviets were unwilling to send more than advisers and light material support,
Fidel Castro’s Cuba unilaterally decided to prevent a collapse of their
socialist brothers. A massive Cuban buildup
of thousands of troops, armor, artillery, air defense/radar, and combat
aircraft would be sent into Angola.
Alongside the Cubans, Moscow felt compelled to send material aide as
well as advisers from across the East Bloc.
Pro-western South Africa, fighting its own counterinsurgency against
SWAPO guerillas in Namibia, along the southern border of Angola, soon clashed
directly with Angolan and Cuban military forces in the field. Several cross border operations to destroy
SWAPO base areas involved direct combat against Cuban mechanized formations and
air/anti-air battles ensued. Throughout
the 80s, the South African Defense Force and Castro’s Cuban led communist
forces clashed in the Angolan Bush seeing some of the largest conventional
battles on the African continent since World War II.[13]
By the late 80s, Castro and the South Africans made terms for the independence
of Namibia and the withdrawal of Cuban forces from Angola. Castro’s goals had prevailed and a socialist
government controls Angola today.
Across the African
continent, in the horn of Africa, a series of Cold War political reverses
pitted Somalia and Ethiopia against one another. Somalia, seeing value in
switching from a Moscow supported government in Mogadishu to a pro-American
venture, decided to expel their Soviet advisers and invade their neighbor,
Ethiopia. The Somali forces seized large treks of the Ogaden
desert and with their Soviet weapons, sought a new patron from President Jimmy
Carter’s administration. Carter, not wishing to get involved in an area that
seemed of little strategic value to the United States refused. Ethiopia, on the
other hand, having embraced the Soviet bloc in a revolutionary coup which
placed a Marxist military commander in power, requested assistance to repel the
Somalis. Once again, Fidel Castro sent his Cuban expeditionary force to fulfill
their internationalist duties. Cuban
armored formations, artillery, and advisers assisted the Ethiopians in battle
against the Somali invaders, eventually driving them out of the Ogaden.[15]
These series of Cuban interventions, although unprompted by Moscow, seemed to disrupt
the balance between the Great Powers in the halls of Washington, who viewed the
deployment of Cuban combat units to Cold War hot spots as a tool Moscow could
employ without risking the direct involvement of the Red Army. In CNN’s 1998 documentary series titled, Cold
War, episode 17 titled, “Good Guys, Bad Guys”, provided a keen insight to
Washington’s views on the Cuban interventions.
In the series, former American Secretary of State, Henry Kissinger
states, “We thought, with respect to Angola, that if the Soviet Union could
intervene at such distances from areas that are far from the traditional
Russian security concern, and when Cuban forces could be introduced into
distant trouble spots and if the West could not find a counter to that, then
the whole international system could be destabilized.” It would be remarkable to be a fly on the
wall within some of the security discussions taking place within the United
States’ defense establishment and possibly hearing a parallel to the
possibility of North Korea’s entry into Ukraine with the Cuban interventions in
Angola and Somalia during the Cold War.
Conclusions
Looking at the
last two months in relation to the historic examples from North Vietnam, Egypt and
the Cold War, two key conclusions can be extrapolated. First, as the DPRK is
outwardly anti-United States and anti-Western culture, it is
clear that the deployment of soldiers to Russia will support the DPRK’s
overall goal of combatting the United States influence. This is an obvious
reason that supported the deployments to Egypt and North Vietnam. Second, as
mentioned, although Russia has not publicly release compensation to the DRPK,
it is likely that Russia will provide missile technology or space technology to
assist the DPRK efforts in those areas in the short term. It is possible that
Russia may also assist the DPRK nuclear program in the long term, but this has
not been corroborated. Further, the DPRK action resemble those of Cuba
attempting to obtain the favor of Soviet Russia. In a similar line of thought,
like the Cubans did, the DPRK may also be seeking diplomatic support from the
Russians in the future, as an international security blanket of support.
When
it comes to the DPRK and Russia, what may come next is up for debate, but based
on historic examples and the capabilities of the DPRK there are a few probable
actions to come. Based on the deployment experience in Egypt, and since the
Russian Air Force has been degraded throughout the conflict, it is probable
that the DPRK could send over in the next deployment of troops, pilots that are
familiar with Soviet Era aircraft to provide air support to Russian ground
operations. Finally, since “Russia is struggling to meet its monthly recruiting
goal of roughly 25,000 troops as its casualties mount […]”, it is very probable
that the DPRK could send thousands more soldiers to fill the Russian
requirement to take back land invaded by Ukraine.[16]
Like
many events that happen today there are historic examples, therefore it should
not be a significant surprise that the DPRK has deployed troops to Russia. It
could be assessed that, the DPRK especially wants to
project to the world that the regime and the country is strong enough to impact
geopolitical issues beyond its immediate region, projecting a position of
strength. Therefore, additional soldiers to support DPRK’s historically closest
ally, is a very likely eventuality. Although what is yet to be seen in the near future, will be if these thousands of soldiers
will actually turn the tides of war in the Kursk region and put the Ukrainians
back on the defense.
Author Bios:
Captain Willis is a U.S. Air Force officer stationed at Cannon AFB, NM and
a Fellow with the Consortium of Indo-Pacific Researchers (CIPR). He
is a distinguished graduate of the University of Cincinnati’s AFROTC program
with a B.A. in International Affairs, with a minor in Political
Science. He has multiple publications with the Consortium, United
States Naval Institute’s (USNI) Naval History Magazine, Air
University’s Journal of Indo-Pacific Affairs (JIPA), Air
University’s Wild Blue Yonder Journal, and Air Commando Journal. He
is also a featured guest on multiple episodes of Vanguard: Indo-Pacific,
the official podcast of the Consortium, USNI’s Proceedings Podcast,
and CIPR conference panel lectures available on the Consortium’s YouTube
channel.
Capt Donnelly is a
U.S. Air Force officer stations at Joint Base Langley-Eustis, VA and is a
Fellow with the Consortium of Indo-Pacific Researchers (CIPR). He has an
undergraduate degree in History with a double minor in Political Science and
Aerospace Leadership Studies from Bowling Green State University in Ohio. Capt Donnelly additionally has a graduate degree in Global
Security Studies with a specialization in National Security from Angelo State
University in Texas. He has published multiple articles with the Consortium and
Journal of Indo-Pacific Affairs (JIPA). Finally, Capt
Donnelly is also featured as a moderator and guest on the Vanguard:
Indo-Pacific podcast series and has served as an academic mentor to interns
with the consortium.
[1] Micah
McCartney, “North Korea Responds to Claims Troops Deploying to Russia-Ukraine
War”, Newsweek, (October 22, 2024), https://www.newsweek.com/north-korea-news-responds-troops-deploy-russia-ukraine-war-1972718.
[2] Greg
Wehner, “South Korea demands withdrawal of North Korean troops allegedly
helping Russia fight Ukraine”, Fox News, (October 21, 2024), https://www.foxnews.com/world/south-korea-demands-withdrawal-north-korean-troops-allegedly-helping-russia-fight-ukraine.
[3]
Julian E. Barnes, Eric Schmitt and Michael Schwitz, “50,000 Russian and North
Korean Troops Mass Ahead of Attack, U.S. Says”, New York Times,
(November 10, 2024), https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/10/us/politics/russia-north-korea-troops-ukraine.html?smid=nytcore-android-share.
[4]
Ibid.
[5]
Brendan Cole, “Russia resists deploying ‘Highly Trained’ North Koreans in
Combat: Report”, Newsweek, (November 28, 2024), https://www.newsweek.com/russia-resists-deploying-highly-trained-north-koreans-combat-1993052.
[6]
Michael Shear, “Why is North Korea deploying troops to help Russia? Here’s what
to know”, New York Times, (October 24, 2024), https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/24/us/politics/north-korea-russia-ukraine.html?smid=li-share.
[7] Benjamin
R. Young, “The Origins of North Korea-Vietnam Solidarity: The Vietnam War and
the DPRK”, Woodrow Wilson Center NKIDP, (February 2019), https://www.wilsoncenter.org/publication/the-origins-north-korea-vietnamsolidarity-the-vietnam-war-and-the-dprk.
[8]
Ibid.
[9]
Ibid.
[10]
Balazs Szalontai, “Courting the “Traitor to the Arab Cause”: Egyptian-North
Korean Relations in the Sadat Era, 1970-1981”, S/N Korean Humanities, Vol 5,
Is 1, (March 2019), https://doi.org/10.17783/IHU.2019.5.1.103.
[11]
Niu Song, “North Korea’s Middle East Diplomacy and the Arab Spring”, Israel
Journal of Foreign Affairs, (May 18, 2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23739770.2016.1181921.
[12] Balazs
Szalontai, “Courting the “Traitor to the Arab Cause”: Egyptian-North Korean
Relations in the Sadat Era, 1970-1981”.
[13]
Fontanellaz, Adrien, Jose Matos, and Tom Cooper. War of Intervention in
Angola Volume 3: Angolan and Cuban Air Forces, 1975-1985. Helion and
Company, 2020.
[14]
Tom Cooper, Adrien Fontanellaz, Jose Augusto Matos, ”War of Intervention in
Angola” Vol 5., Helion Company, (2019), https://www.helion.co.uk/military-history-books/war-of-intervention-in-angola-volume-5-angolan-and-cuban-air-forces-1987-1992.php.
[15]
Cooper, Tom. Wings over Ogaden: The Ethiopian-Somali War, 1978-1979. Helion and Company,
2015.